Unprecedented dangers: COVID-19 disinformation fuels medical myths
A man wearing a wig with a syringe in it takes part in a demonstration asking for the impeachment of Belgium's government after restrictions imposed to contain the spread of COVID-19, Brussels, Belgium, Jan. 30, 2022. (Reuters Photo)


As the pandemic enters another year and continues to wreak havoc across the globe, new misinformation and disinformation about the pandemic, the virus, the vaccines and science have been unprecedentedly high, fueling medical myths all around.

Unverified studies, unproven claims and out-of-context data are regularly shared on websites and social media across the globe – fueling dangerous myths about the virus and the vaccines.

As Austria becomes the first European Union country to make vaccines mandatory this week, let's look at some common misinformation surrounding the jabs.

Causation vs. chronology

A common concern about the COVID-19 vaccines is that they can cause harm, or even death, to those who get them.

Some websites claim to link health risks to the jabs. Others offer information that is then used by people as alleged proof that vaccines are dangerous.

The United States Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a database that reports alleged harm caused by vaccines.

The website is open to the public and anyone can submit a report.

But VAERS clarifies that it cannot be used as proof of vaccine harm.

"A VAERS report does not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused the health problem, only that the symptoms occurred after vaccination," it says in its search engine training video.

If a symptom occurs after vaccination, it does not necessarily mean that the symptom occurred as a result of the vaccination – a matter of causation versus chronology.

The VAERS site makes it clear that reports "may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable."

But VAERS data has been used by French politician Martine Wonner to claim 54 American children had died as a result of COVID-19 jabs.

Wonner used the data to argue that French children should not be vaccinated.

Leading medical bodies in the United States and Europe have said that rare side effects can occur as a result of some of the vaccines – blood clots or myocarditis, for example – but that the benefits of taking the jabs outweigh the risks.

Immune system and infertility

Other common medical myths have no scientific proof but persist, for example, vaccines can weaken the immune system, cause infertility or modify our DNA.

A December post from a U.S. website claimed COVID-19 shots caused something called "vaccine acquired immune deficiency syndrome," citing a study.

But the study in question – which covered the waning effects of vaccines over time – did not mention any such "syndrome."

One of its authors confirmed to Agence France-Presse (AFP) that the post amounts to "misinformation."

The bogus health claims don't end there.

One video created in 2020 that continued to be shared online into 2021 claimed that "97 percent of corona vaccine recipients will become infertile," citing a "Big Pharma whistleblower."

But infertility is not cited as a side effect in any vaccine so far – for coronavirus or anything else.

"There's no vaccine in the world that can cause infertility," Katharine White, an obstetrics and gynecology professor at Boston University School of Medicine, told AFP when asked about the matter last year.

Claims about some vaccines altering DNA have also taken hold online.

They involve mRNA vaccines, which tell the body to produce proteins that resemble those of the virus instead of using a component or modified virus, as seen in the flu vaccine, for example.

The technology has led some to believe untrue claims that vaccines interfere with people's genes.

But our genes are located in a special part of our cells called the nucleus, and messenger RNA (mRNA) jab material does not access that part of our bodies.

That means the material can't reach our DNA.

Stretched statistics

Statistics surrounding vaccines are often taken out of context or distorted to show they are ineffective.

In France, for example, some people point to official figures that say there are more COVID-19 cases in vaccinated people than in unvaccinated people.

But since such a large portion of France's population is vaccinated – more than 75% – it is not surprising that COVID-19 cases are occurring among the vaccinated.

COVID-19 vaccines help prevent severe illness and death – but they do not necessarily prevent the virus from spreading.

That means that cases still occur among the vaccinated, and there will be more cases among the immunized if more people are vaccinated.

And if, for example, 100% of a population is vaccinated, any occurrence of infection or hospitalizations will be among the vaccinated.

It is not a reflection of the vaccines but rather a well-known phenomenon among statisticians known as "Simpson's paradox."