Moscow eyes 'mastering' Arctic waters with nuclear icebreaker fleet
The Russian nuclear-powered icebreaker "50 Years of Victory" is seen at the North Pole on Aug. 18, 2021. (AFP Photo)


As ice cover in the Arctic recedes with climate change, Russia is hard at work to secure supremacy in the warming region with a fleet of giant nuclear-powered icebreakers.

Moscow sees the development of the Arctic as a historic mission and already has huge projects to exploit its natural resources.

Its next big plan is for year-round use of the Northern Sea Route (NSR), a shipping lane through Arctic waters Russia hopes could rival the Suez Canal.

Here are some key facts about Russia's plans for the Arctic:

Historic ambitions

As an icebreaker called the "50 Years of Victory" left the port of Murmansk for the North Pole this summer, its captain told an Agence France-Presse (AFP) journalist on board that Russia has a special role to play in the Arctic.

"A third of our territory lies above the Arctic Circle. Our ancestors have long mastered frozen waters. We are continuing this successfully," Dmitry Lobusov said.

President Vladimir Putin has made the development of the Arctic a strategic priority and state companies such as Gazprom Neft, Norilsk Nickel and Rosneft already have major projects in the Arctic to extract oil, gas and minerals.

"The Arctic region has enormous potential," Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak said earlier this month.

"In terms of resources, we're talking about 15 billion tons of oil and 100 trillion cubic meters of gas. Enough for tens if not hundreds of years," he said.

An infographic shows the Northern Sea Route compared with the Suez Canal route. (Infographic by Daily Sabah)

Suez alternative

The NSR links the Pacific to the Atlantic through Russian Arctic waters.

It is not currently navigable year-round without the help of icebreakers, though in summer some specialized classes of ships can pass through.

With the ice cover receding, Moscow is aiming for year-round navigation by 2030.

The route between east Asia and Europe is considerably shorter than through the Suez Canal.

When a huge container ship blocked the busy Suez shipping lane in March, Moscow touted the Northern Sea passage as a "viable alternative."

Russia hopes to boost traffic through the route from nearly 33 million tons of cargo in 2020 to 80 million tons by 2024 and 160 million by 2035 – still a long way off from the billion tons that pass through the Suez Canal every year.

Russia's state atomic energy corporation Rosatom, which is developing the route and icebreaker fleet, says 735 billion rubles ($10 billion) will be invested by 2024, including 274 billion rubles in state money.

Russian teenagers who won a contest to travel aboard the Russian nuclear-powered icebreaker "50 Years of Victory" look at an iceberg in the Arctic Ocean from the deck of the 160-meter (525-foot) ship on Aug. 20, 2021. (AFP Photo)

Growing fleet

Rosatom, which already has a fleet of five icebreakers and a container ship, is building four more nuclear-powered vessels within the next five years.

Each ship costs more than $400 million to build. Construction requires more than 1,000 people and takes five to seven years.

The ships are designed to resist extreme weather conditions, towering 52 meters (170 feet) high with a length of 173 meters (568 feet) and able to smash through ice up to 2.8 meters (9.2 feet) thick.

No other country operates a comparable fleet, with the United States and China mostly using diesel-electric icebreakers.

Environmental worries

Environmental groups have slammed the race for hydrocarbons and the increased presence of nuclear reactors in the Arctic – an already fragile ecosystem dramatically affected by climate change.

Greenpeace has said that "the incident-ridden history of Russian nuclear icebreakers and submarines" should cause alarm.

"Of course, risks arise when implementing projects in such a fragile ecosystem," Rosatom told AFP in a statement in response to environmental concerns.

But, it said, the "economic opportunities for both the local population and global economy" of the NSR exceed environmental risks.