In $8B Samsung bid, Koreans to side with foreign activist

REUTERS
SEOUL
Published 15.06.2015 22:03
Updated 15.06.2015 22:09
Office workers walk by a logo of Samsung C&T Corp. at its head office in Seoul. Two key Samsung companies are merging in a step toward giving the son of the group's ailing chairman control of the theme parks to smartphones conglomerate.
Office workers walk by a logo of Samsung C&T Corp. at its head office in Seoul. Two key Samsung companies are merging in a step toward giving the son of the group's ailing chairman control of the theme parks to smartphones conglomerate.

In a country with a record of hostility towards foreign capital, some local investors are breaking with tradition as they side with a U.S. hedge fund opposing a merger seen as vital to the transfer of leadership

Hundreds of Samsung C&T Corp's small stakeholders have converged on a public web forum in recent days to protest what they say is a low-ball all-stock takeover offer from Cheil Industries Inc, an affiliate of Samsung Group and the conglomerate's de facto holding company.

Heirs of Samsung Group's founding Lee family want the merger to consolidate holdings of key affiliates including Samsung Electronics Co Ltd into a company under their control. Opponents say the Lee family should pay a higher price.

The online protest is unusual in a culture where South Korea's big family-controlled conglomerates, or chaebol, are seen as pillars of the country's economy and typically get their way. Simply appealing to a sense of patriotism to get a deal done is no longer acceptable, the protesting investors say.

"This is my retirement money," one investor claiming to own

7,000 Samsung C&T shares said on the forum, hosted by Naver, South Korea's top web portal. "I have to protect my assets." The exalted position of chaebol in Korean society wobbled last year when a Hyundai Motor Co-led group paid 10.6 trillion won ($10 billion) for real estate in Seoul that was more than triple the property's appraised value.

The deal angered shareholders and led several domestic institutional investors to publicly criticise the conglomerate - a rare event in a society that values consensus.

Now, the prospect of what critics say is a bad deal for Samsung C&T shareholders has made some retail investors - known as "ants" in local trading circles for the size of their shareholdings - unusually vocal.

Some of them say they will side with Elliott Associates LP, Samsung C&T's third-biggest stakeholder, which opposes the deal. Some of the "ants" are even offering to make the U.S. hedge fund their proxy at the Samsung C&T shareholder meeting to vote on the deal in July.

"The practice of demanding sacrifice from only the ants needs to change," one investor said on Paxnet, a popular site for retail investors. Elliott has filed two court injunctions seeking to block the deal. It has also sent letters to major Samsung C&T shareholders including South Korea's National Pension Service and Samsung SDI Co Ltd - another Samsung Group firm - urging them to vote against the merger.

Yoon Suk-keun, CEO of Seoul-based Ilsung Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, which owns about 2.1 percent of Samsung C&T, said Cheil's offer undervalues C&T. But his firm hasn't decided how it will vote and does not plan to act in concert with Elliott, Yoon told Reuters in an e-mail.

Local support for the foreign fund's stance is unusual given South Korea's long-running suspicion towards foreign private equity and hedge funds. The stereotype of the money-hungry foreign opportunist is a staple of local media coverage. U.S.-based private equity firm Lone Star remains the archetypical villain, often portrayed as a greedy investor that took advantage of the country in the aftermath of the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis, profiting massively from its investment in Korea Exchange Bank. Cheil and Samsung C&T, a construction arm of the Samsung group, insist that the offer, made last month, is in accordance with the law. Critics complain that it is unfair because the book value of Samsung C&T's stakes in listed firms such as Samsung Electronics was around 13 trillion won at the end of March - 46 percent higher than the valuation assigned to the company by Cheil.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter