On the Horn of Africa, China's checkbook diplomacy poses serious challenges to the U.S. as now both countries are seeking to extend their commercial and diplomatic influence in the region
Recently, two major developments in Somalia and Djibouti have attracted international media attention. John Kerry became the first U.S. secretary of state to visit Mogadishu and China has negotiated the construction of a military base in the strategic port of Djibouti. These two symbolic and substantive developments represent both an opportunity and a challenge for the U.S. geopolitical interests in the Indian Ocean and the Red Sea. Contemporary U.S. foreign policy, which is hardwired for counter-terrorism posturing, has been on a losing streak in Iraq, Afghanistan and Yemen, to name a few. On the Horn of Africa, it is facing some serious challenges with China's checkbook diplomacy, Ethiopia's hegemonic adventures and the indirect effects of the Arab Spring.
Touchdown in Mogadishu
Kerry's trip to Mogadishu came in an election year when the Democratic frontrunner is being accused of foreign policy recklessness and at a time when the State Department is too cautious to even say when the American embassy might open there. As such, it is more than a symbolic gesture, it was a strategic one, poor timing notwithstanding. Contrary to some Somali and U.S. media headlines that were quick to claim that Kerry's historic trip to Somalia was an expression of U.S. confidence and a "show of support" to the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) and Ethiopia-led balkanization process known as the Federalization Process, the impetus driving the trip was geopolitical in nature. At the airport compound, days after concluding the latest of the balkanization conferences in Garowe, Puntland, Kerry met with four Somali presidents and one prime minster, though not his Somali counterpart.
So, what was on the agenda? And were all these actors on the same page? It really did not matter. The trip was about a place holder, an affirmation that the U.S. is still interested in Somalia and is anxiously waiting for competent partners who know what they want and what they have as leverage. In a five-minute prerecorded video that was intended to bypass the seemingly ragtag leaders that he was scheduled to meet with, Kerry spoke to the people. He told the Somali people that he "focused on ... steps that must be taken on the Vision 2016 [election] to advance Somalia's development as a unified, federal state." "We all have a stake in what happens here in Somalia ..." he added.
While Kerry is right on the latter, supporting a unified Somalia governed through a clan-based federal system of ever-descending allegiance is a bloody pipe dream. The nation formerly known as Somalia is more divided today than ever before as a result of such dichotomous combinations. As erratic as its foreign policy toward Somalia may have been, the U.S. seems to have realized that its policy toward Somalia is part of the problem, and that the current Somali politicians have indicated that they neither think nor function as leaders of a single nation. Directly or indirectly, each one of them is committed to keeping politics at the clan level, or more bluntly, in the gutter, where geostrategic negation that could benefit both nations is utterly impossible.
China's checkbook diplomacy
China now has over $200 billion invested in Africa; a significant financial interest that may explain why China not only has economic, but "political and military deals with a number of African states." Djibouti is one of those states, and China has invested $9 billion in it. On the one hand, the latest venture might underscore a consistent survival-oriented strategic pattern in which Djibouti, a tiny strategic country located in perhaps Africa's toughest neighborhood, partners with any willing power that could empower it economically and security wise. On the other hand, the latest could prove a counterintuitive enterprise that profoundly impacts the balance of power in one of the most important strategic waterways and thus ensure a geopolitical advantage for China over the rest.
Against this backdrop, the shocking part is not that Djibouti is willing to become the first nation to host two competing superpower, or "frenemies," but that China is confident enough to setup a military base right next to the U.S., France and Japan in the tiny Horn of Africa nation.
The hegemon of the Horn
Meanwhile, as the African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) is set to face the security threats emanating from al-Shabaab's party-balloon effect, it certainly risks a mission creep. Such an outcome, needless to say, would automatically boost the strategic position of Ethiopia - the only country with the military might, devout cronies and political will to engross Somalia or feast on it a few bites at a time. In the past two decades, Ethiopia has proven its mastery of projecting itself as a problem-solving nation. Whether one gets its diplomatic façade that I refer to as "injera diplomacy" or its predatory side depends on Ethiopia's immediate hegemonic interest. Injera is a spongy Ethiopian flatbread served with a variety of meat and vegetable stews. With it, one can easily scoop much of the stew one bite after another without dirtying one's hand.
Make no mistake, Ethiopia is a stakeholder in the Chinese deal with Djibouti. As a landlocked nation with a growing economy, Ethiopia is counting heavily on China's scheduled project to expand Djibouti's sea port. The former has recently purchased three merchant ships that are docked in Djibouti. Ethiopia has been making its chess moves as it is mindful that, sooner or later, its policy toward Somalia will collide with the U.S.'s strategic interest in that country. Ethiopia not only offers economic incentives to Djibouti and political clout within IGAD, it also grants it reassurances in dealing with future threats that may emanate from the ethnically-Ethiopian Djiboutian Afar community, which is a significant number of the population.
Geopolitics and geo-strategy
On Jan. 19, 2010, "U.S. officials and the Yemeni government agreed to set up a military base in Socotra to counter pirates and al Qaida." Socotra has a rare combination of strategic geographical location, minimal population and remoteness from media attention and scrutiny.
Now, with a hybrid political/sectarian wildfire raging in the Gulf of Aden and the specter of a Houthi upper hand and subsequent Iranian direct influence in Yemen is looming, the U.S. is standing on thin ice in terms of its strategic maritime position and influence. A unified and sovereign Somalia could be a significant factor in tipping the strategic balance of power both in the Indian Ocean and the Red Sea.
The next leadership team would have to be mindful of the importance of cultivating a strategic partnership with the US. It is the only way to protect Somalia from neighborhood political predators. But such a partnership could only happen with a new U.S. policy toward Somalia.
About the author
Somalian former diplomat and a foreign policy analyst, @4DialogSK
to read our informative text prepared pursuant to the Law on the Protection of Personal Data No. 6698 and to get information about the
used on our website in accordance with the relevant legislation.
6698 sayılı Kişisel Verilerin Korunması Kanunu uyarınca hazırlanmış aydınlatma metnimizi okumak ve sitemizde ilgili mevzuata uygun olarak kullanılan
ilgili bilgi almak için lütfen