A lawyer for Julian Assange said an agreement announced by Ecuador's president to end his stay in the South American country's London embassy is not acceptable, the Telegraph reported on Thursday.
"The suggestion that as long as the death penalty is off the table, Mr. Assange need not fear persecution is obviously wrong," Assange's lawyer Barry Pollack told the Telegraph, as reported by dpa. "Since such charges appear to have been brought against Mr. Assange in the United States, Ecuador should continue to provide him asylum," he added.
Ecuador's president has ramped up pressure on Julian Assange to leave his country's embassy in London, saying that Britain had provided sufficient guarantees that the WikiLeaks founder won't be extradited to face the death penalty abroad. Lenin Moreno's comments in a radio interview Thursday suggest that months of quiet diplomacy between the U.K. and Ecuador to resolve Assange's situation is bearing fruit at a time when questions are swirling about the former Australian hacker's legal fate in the U.S.
Assange has been holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy since 2012, when he was granted asylum while facing allegations of sex crimes in Sweden that he said were a guise to extradite him to the U.S. But his relations with his hosts have soured to the point that Moreno earlier this year cut off his access to the internet, purportedly for violating the terms of his asylum by speaking out on political matters. Assange in turn sued, saying his rights as an Ecuadorian — he was granted citizenship last year as part of an apparent attempt to name him a diplomat and ferry him to Russia — were being violated.
The mounting tensions has drawn Moreno closer to the position of Britain, which for years has said it is barred by law from extraditing suspects to any jurisdiction where they would face capital punishment. But nothing is preventing it from extraditing him to the U.S. if prosecutors there were to pledge not to seek the death penalty. Assange has long maintained that he faces charges under seal in the U.S for revealing highly sensitive government information on his website. Those fears were heightened when U.S prosecutors last month mistakenly referenced criminal charges against him in an unrelated case.